![]() ![]() Stake is by far my favourite online casino. Again, use a little logic as to why they would have to do that from a regulatory perspective.Īgain, I'm not saying that Stake=Bad. He has also explained that they are removed from the big races an hour before the end in the interest of fairness to regular customers. The second contains numerous examples of streamers and casinos exposing themselves.Įdit: Also, Eddie has even said on stream that certain influencers are given money to stream with on the site. This guy does a far better job than I'm able to at explaining what is going on and why it isn't okay. Applying common sense to a decision tree goes a long way. Streamers have been caught out on numerous occasions. There is plenty of evidence that this taking place. For a guy who insists on being provided "irrefutable evidence that could be presented in court & stand up against cross-examination" in order to reach his conclusions, you've managed to jump to three conclusions right off the bat and we haven't even gotten to the part about the fake-money streaming. ![]() You reached that conclusion by yourself because I criticised the use of marketing via affiliation with fake-money streamers. Stake is a fantastic platform and I have never discouraged anybody from using it. How can I be "hiding my real identity" on a purpose-built platform for anonymous, verification-free crypto gambling? Also, the use of alts is not against Stake ToC. I have seen many people lose their house, car(s) and jobs, for writing posts that cannot be proven (even though they were certain in their own minds that their posts were correct). Just a bit of advice (not necessarily pertinent) to this post.īefore posting anything online, Be certain that you can 100% back up what you are posting. I'm looking for irrefutable evidence that could be presented in court & stand up against cross-examination. I'm not interested in any hearsay anecdotes or edited clips, screenprints etc. With having a background in legal services, I'd be very keen to see indisputable evidence of what you are alleging. You then say how great Stake is as a platform, But encourage others to quit stake because of underhanded dealings with cheats, scammers etc. But hiding your true username means (IMO) there is something that you want to remain hidden. (not sure if this is violation of rules or not). ![]() You stated that you were using an alt to post your messages. I think the reason you got muted was because of the contradictory meanings in your messages you were putting across along with using an alt account to hide your real identity while making these posts. Or is this just something that Stake will continue to sweep under the rug by muting/banning users who bring it up? My alt got permanently muted without even a warning for talking about this in chat so perhaps a better discussion might be had over here on the forum. Look at the fines companies like Bet365 have had to shell out for misleading practices and decide whether it's really worth it. No UKGC regulated casino would touch those streamers with a barge pole. Stake appears to be moving in the right direction in terms of entering into the regulated markets, of the UK for example. You can't say that you advocate for "Responsible gambling" while at the same time funding streamers to do $50k bonus buys on the way to punting off 6-figure balances, all while pretending it's their own money. We've already seen Twitch get banned in Slovakia and I can't see it being too much longer until other countries follow suit if unrealistic and irresponsible gambling continues to be broadcasted on the platform. I'd like to see Stake get ahead of the curve on this. Sooner or later, the powers that be will clamp down on this practice. I feel that working with individuals like Roshstein, who have been proven time and time again to be using "fake" balances, is damaging to Stake's long-term image and reputation. I find it disheartening to see Stake building partnerships with known fake-money casino streamers. Stake was built on the principles of fairness and transparency.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |